RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04224
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. His Date Departed Last Duty Station (DDLDS), be corrected to
reflect 16 June 2012.
2. His Date Arrived Station (DAS), be corrected to reflect
22 June 2012.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
When his orders were amended because of a local permanent change
of station (PCS), he became eligible for a low-cost move but was
not offered the option. The government incurred no expense with
the local PCS. He desires that this local move be treated as a
low-cost move and his DAS and DDLDS be restored to their
previous dates because his current DAS and DDLDS do not allow
him to compete for a squadron leadership opportunity, should it
present itself, this year. His Division Chief and Assignments
Manager are both willing to release him from his current
assignment, in accordance with AF 36-2110, Assignments, if he is
hired for a leadership position.
In support of his request, the applicant submits copies of his
AF Form(s) 899, Request and Authorization for Permanent Change
of Station Military, service history data, travel voucher
summary, email correspondence, and an excerpt from chapter 2 of
AFI 36-2110.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of Major, O-4.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPALR recommends approval. DPALR states that the
applicants original assignment was to a stabilized tour for
which a low-cost PCS is not desirable, thus it was not offered,
since it would not have been in the best interest of the Air
Force. However, that assignment was cancelled and he was
diverted to a non-stabilized tour. During this change of
assignment is when he could have been offered the low-cost PCS
option, but, because of an administrative oversight, it was not
offered. Due to circumstances outside of the applicant's
control and with his losing leaderships concurrence, they
recommend approval of his request to change his DAS and DDLDS as
requested.
The complete AFPC/DPALR, evaluation with attachment, is at
Exhibit B.
AFPC/DPAPSF recommends approval. DPAPSF states that a change to
the original PCS code and a return to the applicants original
DAS/DDLDS is warranted. Although the applicant has a fully
funded PCS order made consistent with normal PCS selection
criteria, once diverted from the stabilized tour to the non-
stabilized tour, a low-cost PCS would have been in the best
interest of both the applicant and the Air Force and could have
been offered or volunteered for. The applicant would likely
have been approved for a low-cost PCS had he known about the
program and submitted the required documents.
The complete AFPC/D DPAPSF, evaluation with attachment, is at
Exhibit C.
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 28 February 2014, for review and comment within 30
days (Exhibit D). To date, a response has not been received.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice warranting
corrective action. We took notice of the applicants complete
submission in judging the merits of the case and agree with the
determination of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility
that a change to his permanent change of station (PCS) fund code
and a return to the applicants original Date Arrived Station
(DAS) and Date Departed Last Duty Station (DDLDS) is warranted.
In this respect, we agree the applicant may not have been
provided appropriate counseling concerning entitlements for a
low-cost move when he was diverted to a non-stabilized tour.
Accordingly, we recommend his records be corrected as indicated
below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show:
a. AF Form 899, Request and Authorization for Permanent
Change of Station Military, dated 16 April 2013, be amended in
Item 19, Authority and PCS Code, to change PCS ID: from C to
V.
b. His Date Departed Last Duty Station (DDLDS) is
corrected to reflect 16 June 2012.
c. His Date Arrived Station (DAS) is corrected to reflect
22 June 2012.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 22 May 2014, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-04224 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 August 2013, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPLAR, dated 16 October 2013.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPSF, dated 12 November 2013.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 February 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02263
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02263 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His most recent Air Force (AF) Form 899, Request and Authorization for Permanent Change of Station Military be changed to reflect a no cost permanent change of station (PCS) so that he can apply for a Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) waiver to...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02780
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 29 Sep 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that her AF Form 899, Request and Authorization for Permanent Change of Station Military, Special Order AE-034622 dated 19 Jan 11, be amended in Item 19, Authority and PCS Code,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05588
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05588 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that: Her AF Form 899, Request and Authorization for Permanent Change of Station - Military, dated 15 July 2013, be amended in Block 19, Authority and PCS Code, to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03496
of Air Force Instruction DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03496 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) date be changed to 1 August 2009 rather than 3 December 2011. In addition, in order to be considered for a low-cost PCS, the member has to specifically ask for consideration and...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02543
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02543 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His duty history and duty station be corrected to reflect Creech Air Force Base (AFB) so he can file his travel voucher for a low-cost permanent change of station (PCS) move. The applicant requests his duty history be corrected to reflect he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03613
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03613 INDEX CODE: 113.04 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 MAY 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) date, incurred due to a Permanent Change-of-Station (PCS), be changed from 29 Jun 06 to 31 May 05. He has not provided sufficient justification or...
Rather than change member’s PDD and RNLTD, the MPF erroneously amended member’s PCS orders to reflect TDY en route. Member d 8 August 1998 and proceeded to her new permanent duty station ar signature on the attached DD Form 1840 (Atch 1) confirms that she was in the area of her new permanent duty on 13 August 1998, the date her household goods were delivered. A PCS cannot be continued, nor can a PCS order be amended to change the permanent duty station after the RNLTD.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01953
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01953 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The date of the order assigning him from Kunsan Air Base, Korea, to Dover Air Force Base (AFB), Delaware (DE) be changed from 30 August 2012 to 20 July 2012 so he can receive reimbursement for moving his family and household goods (HHG) from Virginia (VA) to Delaware (DE). Amended Order AG-033513, dated 11 January...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-02847
DPAPP contacted the 355 FSS to determine why the orders were processed late and was advised by e-mail communique that the applicant did not complete the required personnel out-processing requirements until 19 Mar 2013. We do not deny that the applicant was inconvenienced as a result of the late issuance of his PCS orders; however, in cases where PCS orders are delayed, the requirement and expectation is to postpone the shipment of any household goods until orders are published. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04091
He was counseled by his assignment counselor that his permanent change of station (PCS) orders would be written to include the entitlements that an ERD order would have provided. In this case, the applicant was notified of his assignment to Turkey before his dependents began their travel; therefore, his dependents could travel on his PCS orders. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation...